Resources / Decision guide
In-house SEO or an agency: define the work first.
Choose a resourcing model by the skills, implementation access and review capacity your firm needs.

List the responsibilities before choosing the supplier.
SEO may involve research, writing, technical diagnosis, implementation, reporting and coordination with legal reviewers. One person may cover several tasks, but the brief should not assume that every required skill comes with the job title.
Identify who can approve website changes, professional claims and legal explanations. An external agency cannot remove those responsibilities from the firm.
For paid-search responsibilities, use the separate in-house versus agency Google Ads guide. It covers account access, media spend and campaign reporting.
Compare three workable models.
| Model | Useful when | Responsibility to resolve |
|---|---|---|
| In-house | The workload is ongoing and the firm can recruit, manage and support the necessary skills. | Coverage, tools, development capacity and specialist gaps. |
| Agency | The firm needs a defined delivery scope and access to the supplier’s demonstrated capabilities. | Internal approvals, account access and implementation dependencies. |
| Hybrid | An internal owner coordinates specialist external work. | A clear division of tasks so both teams do not duplicate or omit work. |
Compare the total cost.
For an internal role, include employment costs, recruitment, tools, management time and access to any additional writing or development support. Use your own figures; a generic salary average will not define the actual role.
For an agency, separate the included work from tool charges, development, paid media and optional projects. RankMyFirm’s pricing page gives our current SEO range and terms, while the cost guide explains how to compare scope.
An illustrative responsibility split.
| Task | Possible owner | Completion evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial priorities | Partner or marketing lead | Agreed target services and suitable-enquiry definition. |
| Research and page briefs | Internal specialist or agency | Intent map and reviewable content plan. |
| Legal accuracy | Responsible professional at the firm | Approved facts and explanations. |
| Implementation | Authorised developer or supplier | Checked page or technical change. |
| Enquiry outcomes | Intake team | Consistent classification in the agreed system. |
Test the arrangement with a bounded brief.
Before expanding a relationship, agree one useful set of work and its acceptance checks. A page improvement or technical review can reveal whether communication, approvals and handover function as expected.
Ask for relevant work evidence from any candidate or supplier. Sector familiarity is useful, but a specialist label alone does not prove implementation quality. The agency selection guide provides questions for that assessment.
Sources & further reading
Primary references checked on 6 September 2026.
Let's put your firm
in the conversation.
Bring your website, your priority practice areas and the work you want to make easier. We'll start there.
Book a strategy call Free 30-minute consultation

